Wednesday, December 23, 2015

JEFFREY FROM USA BLAST NIGERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION:ASK THEM TO RISE AND CONDEMN THE ACTIONS OF THE DSS



Following the international awareness and sympathy created by the illegal detention of the leader of IPOB and the subsequent disobedience of court orders by Nigerian DSS. International figures are now wading into what is perceived as deliberate effort to nail down an innocent man. It also appears that neglect of Nigerian constitution seems not to bother Nigerian bar association eventhough it poses threat to the country and also an act of contempt to the court and bar. He questioned the sanity of disobeying court orders and going back to the same court to seek redress and urged judiciary to dismiss further charges against Nnamdi Kanu until the initial order of two competent courts are obeyed.

He however frayed the Nigerian press for ignorance or negligence over their reportage on Nnamdi Kanu, in his words " There is a mistake in the articles concerning Nnamdi Kanu due to negligence or ignorance, the high court released #NnamdiKanu unconditionally, so you (nigerian press) should have written that he was released unconditionally and not granted bail unconditionally, in law, these are all different issues, more so, he was totally absolved from all allegations and therefore there was the concept "Res Judicata" a matter that has been adjudicated by a competent court and may not be pursued further by the same parties, the DSS should have complied to the order of the court by releasing #NnamdiKanu unconditionally before proceeding to the appeal court if they were not satisfied with the ruling of the lower court and should have prayed the appeal court to admit fresh charges if they deem it fit. It is rather appalling that the institution of government who does not obey an order of the court, is still going to the court whom they treat with contempt to seek redress, this of course has a damaging effect on both the bar and the bench, it is therefore trite to urge the judiciary to dismiss any further charges brought by the DSS to any court in Nigeria, with regards to this same issue hence respect for the law and court.

I also want to call on Nigeria Bar association to rise to the occasion and condemn the actions of the DSS, and to be also followed by the National judicial council of Nigeria in the same condemnation. No system shall function effectively without total commitment to the rule of law and obedience to the decisions of the court of law. Thanks, Jeffrey Langley... Anchorage Alaska USA"" as no government is viable without rule of law, the image of Nigeria before the world is still unclear.

Tuesday, December 22, 2015

BUHARI IS A THREAT TO NIGERIANS

.




The refusal of buhari to release Mazi Nnamdi Kalu despite a Federal High Court Order dated 17th December, 2015 is a threat to our lives and freedom as Nigerians. The only reason we are Nigerians is the CONSTITUTION. Our only legal refuge is the Constitution. Indeed when people caution me about my seeming anti buhari posts, I simply respond; I know my rights under the Constitution’. It nows appears the Constitution and the Judiciary cannot save or protect Nigerians.



One thing buhari does not understand, he is a president because and only because there is a Constitution and laws that provide for office of the President. If he tears down the very ladder on which he ascended to Aso rock, even him will not remain in office. Without the Constitution, there will be no Buhari as President of Nigeria and yours truly, there will be no Nigeria in the first place.



This executive stupidity is also of negative international flavour. What investor will come to a Country where laws are not respected? No body is safe in a Country where the President does not respect Orders of Courts. The president who swore on his holy Quran to uphold the rule of law has gone rogue. No one is safe anymore in this Country. If DSS should arrest you today, buhari will not respect any Court order for your release. He has the DSS, the SSS, the Police and the army. You should fear power in the hands of buhari more than you should fear Boko haram or ISIS. Remember 1983-85



Nigeria urgently needs a mechanism for enforcement of Court judgements which is independent of the Executive. We have lost confidence in this government to enforce any law or order that it merely does not like. I will advice my friends to be careful what they post or say. We now have an executive terrorist in Aso rock. No one is safe again. Your rights mean nothing. The Court which is your last hope has been undermined. Please, please be careful.

Biafra: 17 Biafra citizens taken hostage and seized at the Onitsha Army Barracks.


Biafra: 17 Biafra citizens taken hostage and seized at the Onitsha Army Barracks.

Following our call on members of the public to check the whereabouts of their possibly missing friends, neighbors and relatives in connection with the dastardly act, and report such to us through contact links attached in the statement; more details have emerged

The details include the abduction of two members of the royal family of Ichi Community in Ekwusigo Local Government Area of Anambra State. They are Princes Ogechukwu Okonkwo (31) and Nzubechukwu Okonkwo (25). They are sons of Prince Emmanuel Okonkwo; younger brother of the traditional ruler of Community, His Royal Highness, Igwe Lawrence Nwafor Okonkwo. Prince Nzubechukwu Okonkwo was shot by soldiers in two sides of his stomach and was rushed alongside others, by sympathizers to the Multicare Hospital in Omagba Phase 11, Nkpor in Idemili North LGA of Anambra State.

While they were being attended to in the Hospital, the atrocious soldiers stormed the Hospital at 10:08pm and bundled all of them numbering 22 away including some sympathizers and relatives assisting them. They were taken to the Onitsha Military Cantonment, which is a stone’s throw from the Hospital. The soldiers returned late night with five critically injured ones, who were at the point of death and ordered the director of the Hospital to continue their treatments and not to allow any of them to leave the Hospital. The Hospital Director was further ordered to routinely update the Commander of the Cantonment, Col Issah Abdullahi (08053862233). Among those abducted and still held hostage at the Onitsha Military Cantonment are those that sustained leg and arms injuries from the lethal military gunshots.

Till date, the state of their injuries has not been ascertained. Among the sympathizers and relatives of the shot citizens bundled to Onitsha Military Barracks is the elder brother of Prince Nzubechukwu Okonkwo (07019375418); Prince Ogechukwu Okonkwo (08123992263). The 17 citizens taken hostage and seized at the Onitsha Army Barracks on Thursday under the directive of Col Issah Abdullahi are yet to be freed."...........
By.........INTERSOCIETY

BUHARI IS A THREAT TO NIGERIANS.



By Alfred Paul



The refusal of buhari to release Mazi Nnamdi Kalu despite a Federal High Court Order dated 17th December, 2015 is a threat to our lives and freedom as Nigerians. The only reason we are Nigerians is the CONSTITUTION. Our only legal refuge is the Constitution. Indeed when people caution me about my seeming anti buhari posts, I simply respond; I know my rights under the Constitution’. It nows appears the Constitution and the Judiciary cannot save or protect Nigerians.



One thing buhari does not understand, he is a president because and only because there is a Constitution and laws that provide for office of the President. If he tears down the very ladder on which he ascended to Aso rock, even him will not remain in office. Without the Constitution, there will be no Buhari as President of Nigeria and yours truly, there will be no Nigeria in the first place.



This executive stupidity is also of negative international flavour. What investor will come to a Country where laws are not respected? No body is safe in a Country where the President does not respect Orders of Courts. The president who swore on his holy Quran to uphold the rule of law has gone rogue. No one is safe anymore in this Country. If DSS should arrest you today, buhari will not respect any Court order for your release. He has the DSS, the SSS, the Police and the army. You should fear power in the hands of buhari more than you should fear Boko haram or ISIS. Remember 1983-85



Nigeria urgently needs a mechanism for enforcement of Court judgements which is independent of the Executive. We have lost confidence in this government to enforce any law or order that it merely does not like. I will advice my friends to be careful what they post or say. We now have an executive terrorist in Aso rock. No one is safe again. Your rights mean nothing. The Court which is your last hope has been undermined. Please, please be careful.

Why South South States Should Collaborate to Achieve Biafra Struggle – Okocha.


By Amos Igbebe

A foundation member of the Ohanaeze Ndigbo, the apex socio-cultural group of the Igbos, Ogbueshi Emma Okocha, has said that the Biafra struggle was a legitimate one, insisting that all states concerned with the demand for Biafra liberation should not shy away from the call for the emancipation of the zone from the shackles of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Okocha, who spoke with 247ureports.com in Asaba, the Delta State capital, weekend, explained that though the Biafran agitators have no right to include other states which are not principally Ibo speaking states into the Biafran struggle, he said it was incumbent on leaders of other states, especially Delta, to hold a special consultation among opinion leaders before pulling out or aligning with the Biafran movement for liberation and emancipation.

Okocha, who authored ‘Blood on The Niger’, a book which chronicled how Asaba people were massacred during the Nigeria civil war, argued that the minorities in Delta including the Urhobos, the Isokos, the Ijaws and Itsekris would be worse off if they blatantly turned down aligning with the Igbo movement for the call of the Biafra Republic.

He said “The Itsekiris, the Urhobos and the western Igbos are already minorities in the structural arrangement of the Nigerian federation. Imagine when a principal part of that federation leaves, it’s going to have a serious impact on us. So, we need to sit down and think. It’s not for us to just wake up and say we are not part of the struggle or we are for Biafra.

“For me, let there be enough consultation, The Biafrans have no right to come here and match straight to Government House and say they are demanding for Biafra without consulting the people. At the same time I cannot say I’m not part of them because the Nigerian federation will be structurally against the Midwestern people who are minorities already if a bigger part of the Southern States goes away without the Midwestern states going with them”.

Okocha further argued that “To say I support Biafra or I do no support, it’s not important. The important thing is that we need a referendum or plebiscite to decide where we belong. When is it coming like we had in Scotland? Yugoslavia was broken to pieces into Serbia and others. From USSR, you have Ukraine, you have Russia, you have Georgia and you have Belarus. So, we can’t come here and say whether you like it or not, you must join us, it doesn’t go like that. You can’t say that.

“For Anioma Congress to say they are not part of it, that’s thoughtless. What is happening is that if any part of Nigeria manages to secede as the last option, I don’t see how the Idomas of Benue State staying safe in the Nigerian federation if the Igbos secede and leave them for the larger Nigeria.

“What is important for us in Delta is that we need to sit down and decide our fate. It’s not for these mushroom organisations, Anioma group or Isoko group to decide, they don’t understand what is going on.

“There should be an opinion leadership conference in Asaba so that we decide where we should go because if Biafra goes without we, in Delta, joining them, it will have a serious impact on us. We cannot stay alive in another federation. As a minority already, we will be a silent minority forever”.

Following the struggles which Nnamdi Kanu had fought with the federal government of Nigeria, Okocha said Kanu has now become the leader of the Igbo people, noting that Igbos do not elect leaders but their leaders emerge the struggles and the battles they won in their days.

Monday, December 21, 2015

IBB: N40bn for Crude Oil exploration in Northeast, looting by trick …Says nothing survives in war front, danger zone.



IBB: N40bn for Crude Oil exploration in Northeast, looting by trick …Says nothing survives in war front, danger zone

Former Head of State, General Ibrahim Babangida (IBB), has remarked that the N40 billion naira budgeted for Crude Oil exploration in the Northeast by President Muhammadu Buhari, may not only resulted to efforts in futility, but be seen by an average Nigerian as systematic looting by trick.

IBB, who played host to a group, The Coalition of Nigeria Future Leaders, in his Minna country home over the weekend, explained that nothing survives massive destruction in the war front, as far as he knew as a retired general.

He said: “It was least expected of caliber of President Buhari to have even nurtured such unrealistic idea or embrace such destructive advice from any of his Aides or Ministers.

“President Buhari is a retired general and a trained combatant in whom I never believed such move or plan could survive a day.”

The group was on a courtesy visit to the retired general and one of the nation’s statesmen, to officially notify him of his new appointment as the group grand patron.

In his opening remarks, the leader of the group, Comrade Edison Godwin, appreciated the spirit of statesmanship in General Ibrahim Babangida, as he described his silence in the present APC-led federal government as golden and meaningful.

He said no one can compare the retired general to his colleagues who have retired and yet get involved in dirty politics around the Southwest.

He accused President Buhari of taken such step only to appease the Boko Haram sects, as he lamented that it was unfortunate seeing President Buhari now diplomatically granting amnesty to his people, at the expense of the nation’s economy.

Godwin said: “The type of change the All Progressive Congress (APC) brought to Nigerians was least envisaged.

“That the President could have even stoop so low to have relocated the Military Headquarters to the war front was a terrible change on its arrival.”

He said General Ibrahim Babangida must have realised some weaknesses in the leadership of General Muhammadu Buhari as a Military Head of States before he decided to overthrow him in August 27, 1985 in a successful coup.

“No one needs further explanations as to why Buhari was budgeted such huge amount to be wasted in a danger zone like Northeast. It is a crazy economic decision.

“How could a sound retired warlord who had the experience of what the war front always look like decided to expend billions of naira in such an environ? What for, at this challenging period?

“Was that suppose to be part of the changes we were promised as Nigerian youths? The priority to the N5,000 each earlier promised the unemployed graduates?

“President Buhari should realise what will be at stake if such project goes off in a glint of an eye as a result of insurgency,” Godwin admonished.

The host, who later enjoined the group to be good ambassadors of the country, told his guests to live up to the meaning of their name, The Coalition of Nigeria Future Leaders.

“I feel honoured with your choice in me as the grand patron to your group. It’s good having people like you around with this type of positive mindset. Definitely Nigeria shall be great again. Please always see this country as yours and her unity as a must protected. You are the future leaders as you said, and I want you to protect that which you aspire to lead,” IBB advised his guests with his usual gentle smile. Source

Nnamdi Kanu: MASSOB vows to continue protests if.



Nnamdi Kanu: MASSOB vows to continue protests if…


accuses DSS on fresh charges against Kanu
Kanu’s detention may mar Nigeria —Ohanaeze
Reactions trail killing of jubilating IPOB members in Onitsha
Uwazuruike converts MASSOB to BIM youth wing, appoints 3 key officers

By Francis Igata, Nwabueze Okonkwo & Ugochukwu Alaribe

Tension is building up in the South-East and parts of South-South geopolitical zones following the continued detention of the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, and Director Radio Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, who was, last Wednesday, discharged and acquitted by a Magistrate’s Court in Abuja of the treason preferred on him by the Department of State Security Services, DSS.

It will be recalled that Justice Ademola Adeniyi of a Federal High Court, also in Abuja, had, last Thursday, ordered Kanu’s immediate release from DSS detention.

Nnamdi was arrested on October 17, by DSS operatives, shortly after he arrived Nigeria from his base in the United Kingdom, which prompted over one month protests after he was arraigned secretly at Wuse 2 Magistrate’s Court presided over by Justice Shuiabu, who granted him bail on October 19.

Meanwhile, the youth wing of Ohanaeze Ndigbo had warned that the continued detention of the leader Nnamdi Kanu by the DDS, against court order, could spell doom for Nigeria.

The youth group under the banner of Ohanaeze Youth Council, OYC, expressed shock that four days after the Federal High Court, Abuja gave ordered Kanu’s unconditional release, the DSS had continued to hold him.

Similarly, reactions have continued to trail last Thursday’s shooting and killing of five members of IPOB by the Joint Task Force, compromising Army and Navy stationed at the Bridge-head area of the commercial city of Onitsha, Anambra State, who were jubilating the court order for the release of Kanu.
Among those who had so far reacted to the incident include the leader of Biafra Independence Movement, BIM, Chief Ralph Uwazuruike; the Ogirishi of Igboland, Chief Rommy Ezeonwuka, and other human rights groups.

Nerves frayed as Kanu’s not released

The leader of Movement for the Actualization of the State of Biafra, MASSOB, Uchenna Madu, has accused the DSS of deliberately continuing to detain Nnamdi Kanu against two court rulings ordering the security agency to release their leader unconditionally.

“The continued detention of Nnamdi Kanu by DSS after both Magistrate, Federal High courts have discharged and acquitted him of all the frivolous charges against him shows that Nigerian judiciary is not independent. The independency of the three arms of government is a complete sham, which portrays Nigeria as an undemocratic state.

“It is a sign of frustration on Nigeria because of Nnamdi Kanu, agitators for Biafra represents the very truth Nigeria knows but always avoids to identify with it. I know Nnamdi Kanu. He is a real Biafran, who can never succumb to intimidation, deviate or compromise.

“His illegal detention will worsen the already battered image of Nigeria. MAASOB will never relent in identifying with Nnamdi Kanu. We shall continue to press for his release with every legitimate action supported, backed by internationally recongised law, decrees and charters. MASSOB must maintain our non-violent stance, although we have found out that the DSS wants to re-arraign him on fresh trumped-up charges which we will resist,” MASSOB leader warned.

Kanu’s detention may mar Nigeria —Ohanaeze

The Youth Wing of Ohanaeze Ndigbo in a statement by its National President of OYC, Mazi Okechukwu Isiguzoro, condemned the attitude of the DSS over the detained Biafra activist.

“Nigeria is sitting on tenterhook; the looming danger of renewed protests by Kanu’s followers, sympathisers and Biafra agitators is capable of consuming Nigeria and should be avoided. For us, Ohanaeze Youth Council, we are pleading with the Federal Government to, as a matter of sacrifice for the unity of Nigeria, release Nnamdi Kanu.

“This call has become necessary because it will be extremely difficult for us to continue to calm his followers and sympathizers whose see his detention as a provocation. We know how much effort it took us to prevail on IPOB and MASSOB members to stop their protests before the court ruling, and we don’t know what to tell them again as Kanu is still in detention four days after he was discharge by a court of competent jurisdiction.

“President Muhammadu Buhari should help save the country from unnecessary tension by prevailing on the DSS to release Kanu since the courts have discharged and acquitted him.”
OYC also called on the international community to intervene and save Nigeria from plunging into another avoidable civil disturbance instead of coming with aids to refugee camps.

The youth group appealed to Buhari, to prevail on the DSS to free the detained IPOB leader in the interest of peace.

Ohanaeze, also appealed to Biafra agitators and Igbo youths to remain calm as efforts were being intensified to secure freedom for Kanu.

Reactions trail killing of jubilating IPOB members

Meanwhile, reacting to Kanu’s continued detention, Uwazuruike condemned the killing of unarmed civilians by the soldiers, adding that even if the jubilants blocked the road, it should not have been enough excuse to open fire and kill them.

“After all, if the DSS had released Kanu since the Magistrate’s Court gave an order to do so, these orgy of protests would not have arisen in the first place. Ndigbo would henceforth, no longer tolerate indiscriminate shooting and wasting of human lives here in Igbo land by trigger-happy security agencies.”

The BIM leader wondered why the soldiers used live bullets on the crowd instead of using rubber bullets or even tear-gas canisters to scare the jubilants if at all they blocked the road.

Reacting to the development, Chief Ezeonwuka, who spoke to newsmen at the scene of the incident, also condemned the shooting and killing of unarmed persons with live bullets, adding that on the other hand, if it was true that the jubilants had blocked the roads, it was not proper.

“We don’t want shedding of blood here in Igbo land any longer and we don’t want more protests too. What are they protesting about and who are they shooting at? There is nothing to warrant shooting or protesting, particularly now that Nnamdi Kanu has been released by the court.”

Chairman of South East zone of Campaign for Democracy, CD, Uzor A. Uzor, called on the government to set up a panel of inquiry to ascertain the reason for the shooting and punish the culprits accordingly.

Also reacting, the International Society for Civil Liberties and the Rule of Law, Intersociety said, in a statement, yesterday, that the Commander of the Onitsha Military Cantonment and his Chief of Army Staff, COAS as well as the government of Anambra State, should be held fully responsible for the death, injuries and whereabouts of some missing citizens and the murdered members of IPOB members.

The statement by its chairman, Emeka Umeagbalasi, Intersociety said: “We have it on good authority that four to eight dead victims and 13 critically injured members of the public, who were shot dead and critically injured by the soldiers of the Onitsha Military Cantonment in the evening of December 17, 2015, at the Ojukwu Gateway, Onitsha Niger Bridge-head, have been taken away to unknown destination by soldiers of the Cantonment.

“The soldiers after perpetrating the heinous act at the Niger Bridgehead between 2p.m., and 3.30p.m., stormed the Multicare Hospital, on Limca Road, Nkpor, Anambra State, between 8p.m., and 9p.m., and abducted 13 critically injured citizens brought for treatment.

“The four dead citizens were also said to have earlier been taken away by the soldiers from the scene of the shooting. Till this moment, their whereabouts have remained unknown.”

Uwazuruike converts MASSOB to BIM youth wing

Meanwhile, in his bid to exert his authority and ensure that charlatans do not infiltrate MASSOB, its founder and leader of Biafra Independence Movement, BIM, Chief Ralph Uwazuruike, had converted MASSOB into youth wing of BIM.

Uwazuruike said with its inauguration and appointment of its key officers, MASSOB, had been restructured and strengthened to continue with the non-violent struggle in the revalidation of a Biafran statehood.

A statement, yesterday, by BIM’s Deputy Director of Information, Mazi Chris Mocha, quoted Uwazuuruike as saying that before one could be admitted into the hierarchy of BIM, such an officer must have worked for MASSOB which is BIM’s youth-wing for at least, five years and above to be able to understand the principles of non-violence in the Biafra struggle.

The statement recalled the Biafran leader, Uwazuruike had at an enlarged special meeting of BIM/MASSOB, attended by Biafran elders-in-council, Biafran zonal leaders, Biafran regional administrators and directors, named Chief Solomon Chukwu as the leader of MASSOB, the youth wing of BIM, while Mr. sunny Okereafor and Great Agomo were named as MASSOB National Director for Information and MASSOB National Director for Seminar respectively.Source

Sunday, December 20, 2015

BIAFRA/NNAMDI KANU: ArchBishop Of Abuja, Cardinal Onaiyekan Blasts Buhari.



The ArchBishop of Catholic Diocese of Abuja, Cardinal John Olorunfemi Onaiyekan has said that Nigerian president remains a dictator.

“There is no sign that Nigeria has a President ….the problem President Buhari has is that many Nigerians want to continue as they were doing before and they want every­body else to change, but not themselves.”-John Cardinal Onai­yekan, ; The Metropolitan Catho­lic Archbishop of ABUJA has sensationally re­vealed the problems Presi­dent Muhammadu Buhari has.

If you all recall the incumbent president has a long history of a dictator, and NEVER obeys court orders.

The ArchBishop of Catholic Diocese of Abuja, Cardinal John Olorunfemi Onaiyekan has said that Nigerian president remains a dictator.

“There is no sign that Nigeria has a President ….the problem President Buhari has is that many Nigerians want to continue as they were doing before and they want every­body else to change, but not themselves.”-John Cardinal Onai­yekan, ; The Metropolitan Catho­lic Archbishop of ABUJA has sensationally re­vealed the problems Presi­dent Muhammadu Buhari has.

If you all recall the incumbent president has a long history of a dictator, and NEVER obeys court orders.

It is wrong to kill unarmed protesters who dare to challenge your dictatorship

It is wrong to deny the wounded medical Care by further going to the hospitals to arrest them .

It is wrong to deny outrightly the freedom of choice for a people to decide whether or not they wish to remain within a territory

It is wrong to undermine the constitution of Nigeria which is the bases of the Nigerian Nation and expects people not to resist such via protesting .

For those Supporting Mr President can you please justify why he has refused to obey court orders ?

Onitsha killings: Anambra CLO writes Gov. Obiano, demands justice



Our Ref: CLO/ANSB/ VOL03/12/15ANGH/HE/AWK 18TH DEC. 2015

His Excellency Governor Willie Obiano
Executive Governor, Anambra State
Government House
Awka

Sir,

BEFORE ANANMBRA BECOMES ANOTHER CAMBODIA KILLING FIELD, CLO WARNS ON THE IMPLICATIONS FOR YOUR ADMINSTRATION, DEMANDS JUSTICE.

The above subject matter refers.
The Civil Liberties Organisation (CLO) Anambra State Branch is dismayed over the continued slide to bloodletting by the security agents working in the state since the commencement of peaceful protest over the continued detention of the leader of Independent People of Biafra (IPOB).

The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria places you as the Chief Security Officer of the state while you also swore to uphold the safety and welfare of the people as your topmost priority.

Unfortunately, recent events in the state where those armed with instruments of coercion mow down innocent citizens in cold blood in the name of controlling violent protests while their victims are unarmed and defenceless calls to question whether civility taken flight in the state.

Also, Your Excellency’s dangerous silence after the first reported shooting of unarmed members of IPOB on Sunday 30th August 2015 after their peaceful assembly that left at least 3 people dead was quite condemnable. But painful as the first incident could be, the further attacks and killings of indigenous and resident people mostly youths in Anambra while your administration seemingly panders to the wishes of the President Buhari led Federal government of Nigeria in accomplishing its seeming hatred of Ndigbo is a serious indictment on your person and administration.

Your Excellency may be aware that subsequent shootings and attack on the unarmed protesters from August 30 2015 till December 17 has led to the painful death of at least 24 citizens which you swore to protect and also left at least 50 critically injured, some with permanent disabilities.

While the we in the South East Coalition of Human Rights Organizations; comprising the International Society for Civil Liberties & the Rule of Law (Intersociety), Anambra State Branch of the Civil Liberties Organization (CLO), the Center for Human Rights & Peace Advocacy (CHRPA), Human Rights Club(HRC) (a project of LRRDC), Southeast Good Governance Forum (SGGF), Forum for Equity, Justice & Defense of Human Rights (FEJDHR), Society Advocacy Watch Project (SPAW), Anambra Human Rights Forum (AHRF), the International Solidarity for Peace & Human Rights Initiative (INTERSOLIDARITY) and the Street Law Africa (LawAfrica) have consistently condemned the continued detention of the leader of IPOB, Nnamdi kanu, calling for his unconditional release and the serious human rights violations continuously meted on the peaceful protesters, we were alarmed on the government public announcement warning any group against assembling under any guise and also giving/ arming the security agencies with the might to deal with anybody found breaking the law.

We make bold to say Your Excellency, that it was the public service announcement with your imprimatur that emboldened, propelled and fuelled the ease with which the soldiers opened fire on the jubilating Anambrarians who were sent to their early graves unprepared on the 17th of December 2015.

More heartbreaking was the continued resort to a climate of impunity by the same military or Joint Task Force set up by your administration following the reported invasion of Multicare Hospital, Omagba , Onitsha and the forceful taking away of the critically injured victims to an unknown destination.

While we expected your administration to take immediate and urgent steps to address the anomalies, your public broadcast where you said in your own words that, “the death of these young men and women in these protests is a sad chapter in the history of peaceful agitations in Nigeria. It is regrettable but we must accept it as some of the sacrifices we must make in Nigeria’s march to a stronger and more united country” to say the least is another unguarded utterance from the State Chief Executive intended to cause more harm than to heal or placate an already worse situation.

Your Excellency may also be aware that men of Nigeria Navy, Ogbaru Command domiciled at Iyiowa Odekpe with special emphasis on the squad stationed at Uga Junction by Mobil Filling Station, Bridge Head have caused untold harm to the image of your administration. From abdicating from their core responsibilities, the squad has taken special delight in brutalizing innocent citizens. Some are beaten with gun butts and horse whips while some others are made to roll on the ground or drink gutter flood sometimes on the flimsy reason of crossing the expressway without taking the pedestrian bridge.

Another fallout from Your Excellency’s broadcast is the fact that the bulk of the policemen drafted into the state in the wake of the provoked violent protest coupled with those already domiciled here have all gone hare wire.
Most residents going about their normal businesses are routinely arrested and labeled MASSOB/IPOB members and clamped into detention. Freedom is often regained after the exchange of cash in high digits. Motorcycle riders are summarily arrested based on your Okada restriction law and are made to pay N5000 which expressly enters into the private pockets of the arresting police officer/ team. The most annoying part of it is that most of the bike riders are arrested while they are pushing their bike to cross over to the non restricted routes or when they get to a road junction switching over to the other side.

Your Excellency, the import of this letter is to remind you that posterity is recording your actions and inactions both in this unfolding dark period of killings in Anambra and in other aspects of your administration. A certain Pontius Pilate washed his hands during the trial of Jesus Christ by the Jews but never took any decisive action to save Jesus from their hands because he wanted to please Ceaser. Today and even centuries to come, his name will always crop up for his action and inactions.

Your Excellency, may also see the position of our National President, Barr Comrade Uche Wisdom Durueke in the wake of one of our letters over the killing and maiming of non armed protesters in Anambra . He said: “I maintain that protest is an important democratic component of freedom of expression and freedom to assemble. Protest is an inalienable right of the human person. It starts from the womb. Babies kick inside the womb thereby expressing the desire to come out: inherent sense of liberty. When babies are delivered, they come out crying. This is as a result of the new environment. This is life!

“The Federal Government should prosecute all security personnel involved in the recent killing of protesters and reckless shooting of the protesters. Let the protesters that come in conflict with the law, for example, if any loots, be dealt with under the due process law; not killing. The criminal intention of the security personnel becomes obvious when the protesters are not armed and are non-violent. Some security personnel kill on ground of hate camouflaged as threat to security. This is one important reason the Federal Government should always make security personnel account for killing of protesters, regardless of the cause. You don’t kill a fellow citizen who is not armed for expressing himself or herself.

“Apart from the issue of human right, when the State kills any protester for a cause, the cause gains more adherents who find the justification of the cause in the Killing. The reason is usually and simply this: if they are telling lies, why is the government killing them? The agitations across the country will naturally calm, if we enthrone equity in governance – that’s providing for the basic needs of the citizens and giving the citizens the confidence and pride of being citizens of Nigeria.

“I always say this: if any man or woman wishes bright future, he or she must take bright positions and take bright actions. It applies to nations too”

Our position in the South East Human Rights Coalition in one of our recent public statements still suffices: “Constitutional & Global realities of the Southeast (Biafran) self determination agitation: It is our firm stand that rights of the people to existence, development and self determination; irrespective of their race, colour, religion, ethnicity or class, are internationally and regionally preserved and protected provided they do not use or advocate violence. Though the success of using violence to advocate for and achieve these rights is determined by the doctrine of necessity (i.e. Eritrea from Ethiopia in 1993, South Sudan from Sudan in 2011, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia & Herzegovinian, Macedonia, Serbia and Montenegro from Yugoslavia in 1991/2), but violence of any kind is abhorred and prohibited locally, regionally and internationally. Our collective sympathy for the assertion of rights to existence, development and self determination by the people or race under reference is built on two strong premises of use of non violence and the fact that the Nigerian Constitution, regional and international treaties recognize and protect the rights in question.
“Rights to life, dignity of human person, personal liberty, freedom of expression, movement, peaceful assembly and association and freedom from discrimination are expressly provided in Sections 33, 34, 35, 36, 40, 41 and 42 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Rights to existence, development and self determination are also provided in Article 20, etc of the African Charter on Human & Peoples Rights of 1981; ratified and domesticated by Nigeria in 1983. The right to self determination is also provided in Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights of 1976, signed and ratified by Nigeria in 1993. It is also empirically established that countries in the world have periodically reviewed their concept of togetherness or separation and of the two major available approaches: peaceful and violent means; peaceful means remain the international best practices; which is why we constitutionally sympathize with the Southeast Nigeria’s self determination agitators owing to their non violent approaches”
OUR CALLS AND DEMANDS:
Immediate setting up of an unbiased commission of enquiry into the killings and injuries inflicted on the good people of Anambra State between August and December 2015.
The State Government to tender an unreserved apology on behalf of the security agents for the killings and maiming perpetrated in the state.
The release of the bodies of the murdered victims to the families and the full disclosure of the identities and whereabouts of the injured taken away from the hospital where they are receiving treatment. The government should also bear the full responsibilities for the welfare of their respective families by ensuring that adequate compensation is paid.
The immediate convening of joint security council meeting in the state with a strong and committed resolution that the security agents must be civil and conciliatory in their operations in the state henceforth most especially as it concerns the general public and unarmed civilians.
The resolution to send Naval men away from the Uga junction and restrict the operations of the Navy in Anambra to the waterways.
The relaxing of the restriction of Okada/ motorcycle operations in the state until a better formulated policy framework with inputs from relevant stakeholders is adopted.
That the security agents mostly the police are cautioned seriously on their mode of operations in the state most especially this yuletide season. Their operations must ensure fluidity and unhindered movement instead of gridlock and shutdown in the name of looking for criminals.
The security and welfare of the people must be at the forefront of any government action henceforth.
Yours faithfully for the CLO
Comrade Aloysius Attah
Chairman, Anambra State Branch
08035090548, attahcomrade@yahoo.com
Comrade Chibueze Nwajiaku
Secretary, Anambra CLO.

Cc The Commissioner of Police, Anambra State Command
The Commander, 302 Artillery Regiment, Onitsha
Director, DSS, Anambra State Command
Commanding Officer, Onitsha Naval Outpost
Catholic and Anglican Bishops of Awka, Onitsha , Nnewi and Aguata
The Chairman, Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN)

It Gets Tough As Nigerian Banks Stop Use Of Atm Cards Abroad




Deposit Money Banks have commenced a process to stop all customers from using their payment cards, popularly known as Automated Teller Machine cards, for dollar-denominated transactions when they travel abroad with effect from January 1, 2016.

Banks would not allow their customers to use naira-denominated ATM cards locally for transactions denominated in forex.

This means bank customers will not be able to use their cards to buy products from foreign e-commerce sites like e-bay and amazon.com in which payments are made in forex.

The development follows the lingering scarcity of foreign exchange, especially the dollar, to settle obligations arising from customers’ use of the ATM cards for forex-denominated transactions.

Already, Standard Chartered Bank has notified its customers that from January 1, 2016, they will not be able to use their naira-denominated ATM cards for transactions that are denominated in foreign currencies, either locally or when they travel abroad.

In a notice to its customers, Standard Chartered said, “This is to notify you that from January 1, 2016, your naira card will no longer be enabled for international use. This is as a result of the limited foreign exchange supply in the financial market.”

Asked how long the suspension of cards from international transactions would be, the spokesperson for Standard Chartered Nigeria, Mrs. Dayo Adurogbo, said, “We cannot give a definite date. It depends on how soon it is available. We will do everything to meet our customers’ demand once it is available.”

Saturday, December 19, 2015

Igbo marginalisation unacceptable — Ebitu Ukiwe, Ben Nwabueze, ABC Nwosu, others

Igbo marginalisation unacceptable — Ebitu Ukiwe, Ben Nwabueze, ABC Nwosu, others

By Charles Kumolu

THEIR countenance was business like, an indication of the critical nature of what they had converged for.

Indeed, an issue of uttermost significance could attract such eminent Nigerians of Igbo extraction.

Consider these names: Senator Ike Ekweremadu, Deputy Senate President; Commodore Ebitu Ukiwe, retd; Mr. Peter Obi; Prof Ben Nwabueze, SAN; Prof A.B.C Nwosu; Chief Joe Irukwu, SAN;Senator Hope Uzodinma; Senator Sonni Ogbuju; Sen Ben Obi; Prof George Obiozor; Chief Gary Enwo-Igariwey, and Elder Uma Eleazu.

Others are Prof Osita;Ogbu, Chief Guy Ikokwu, Chief C.C Ifeanyi, Bishop Sunday Onuoha, Chief Charles Odunukwe, Eze C.I. Ilomuanya, Eze Gibson Nwosu, Igwe Chris Onyekwuluije, Chief E. A Ukpabi, Mr. Emeka Ugwu-Oju, Chief C.C Ifeanyi, Chief Christopher Eze, Chief Charles Odunukwe and leaders of various market associations in Lagos, among others.

From Abuja, Enugu, Owerri, Umuahia, Awka, Abakiliki and other parts of the country, they met in Lagos to deliberate on issues affecting the South-East in the light of the o-ngoing street protests by youths in the geo-political zone.

Sunday Vanguard understood that the gathering was at the instance of Ekweremadu under the auspices of Concerned Igbo Elders, Traditional Rulers and Stakeholders.

Instructively, the convergence was the first of its kind since the commencement of the reverberating protests by youths demanding for the sovereign state of Biafra.

The forum was particularly distinguished by the fact that it was of a melting point for every class of the Igbo race, as evidenced by the presence of serving and past government officials, traditional rulers, the clergy, academicians and traders among others.

At the event, chaired by Ukiwe, speakers mirrored the protests within the context of the place of the Igbo in the present dispensation and submitted that the underlying issues are beyond the assumed reasons for the unrest.

Blending the realities on ground with historical instances, they were unanimous in the argument that the South-East has been deliberately relegated out of prominence in the country’s political configuration.

This situation, to them, contravenes all known principles and norms of federalism which the country practices.

With certitude, the speakers dismissed the widely held assumptions that the protests were provoked by the collapsed and inadequate infrastructure in the region.

Psychological and physical pains


The outrage, they enthused, is nothing but the outward expression of the psychological and physical pain arising from the current exclusion of the South-East from the governance of Nigeria.

Sunday Vanguard also learnt, from the uniformity of the contributions to the interaction, that the Ndigbo feel alienated by the distribution of political offices in a manner widely seen as unequal.

Of note, in their reckoning, are key ministerial, security and statutory positions, among others.

A communique, issued at the gathering, further elucidates the posture of Ndigbo.

It read: ‘’This meeting was convened at the instance of the Deputy Senate President, Sen Ike Ekweremadu. The meeting was of the view that Ndigbo are dissatisfied with their current position in Nigeria. The meeting noted that Nigeria is a negotiated federation of three regions in 1960. And our fore fathers played a major role in bringing it to be.

‘’In the First Republic all constituent regions had their separate constitutions and had a say in the exercise of central power in Nigeria. Ditto in the Second Republic with federating units. In the Third Republic, even when the Alliance for Democracy,AD, dominated in the South-West, the then President Olusegun Obasanjo of the PDP made deliberate efforts to bring in AD. That was statesmanship. That was nation building.

Nation builders

‘’It is not in doubt that Ndigbo are nation builders, found all over Nigeria, earning their living and helping to develop the communities in which they are domiciled. Ndigbo do not have an empire mentality and do not wish to dominate any other and would not want to be dominated either.

‘’Ndigbo would never accept to be second class citizens in a country in which their fore fathers laboured along with others to bring into being and to develop. Ndigbo would never be tired of and protesting against injustice and inequity in Nigeria. For as Elie Diesel said ‘’There may be a time when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest against injustice.’’

Street protests by the youths

‘’Ndigbo have reviewed the ongoing street and public protests by the youths calling for Biafra and are of the considered opinion that these are outward expressions of the psychological and physical pain arising from the current exclusion of the South East geo-political zone from the governance of the country and this should be addressed and redressed.

‘’Consequently, Ndigbo strongly recommend that dialogue be embraced in order to remedy the situation. All public protests should be stopped. And more importantly the public protests should not be exported. Ndigbo are deeply saddened by the loss of lives arising from the protest. Enough Igbo blood have been spilled in Nigeria.

Immediate dialogue

‘’To facilitate the immediate initiation of dialogue to remedy the current intolerable Igbo situation in Nigeria, we reiterate the advise given to the Federal Government by Ohaneze Ndigbo to treat the continued detention of Mr. Nnamdi Kanu as a political matter rather than criminal issue. We understand that the courts ordered his release. We urge the Federal Government to abide by the rule of law.

‘’Ndigbo participated actively with other Nigerians at the 2014 National Conference. We see the report of that conference as a veritable document to anchor the proposed dialogue towards the restoration of Nigeria to true federalism which our founding fathers negotiated prior to independence in 1960.

‘’Ndigbo stand firmly on the implementation of the key recommendations of that conference. The meeting stands for, believes in and supports the unity of Nigeria founded on justice and equity.’’

However, moved by the impressive turnout and the ability to have a common voice on the development, Nwabueze called for the sustainance of such oneness on issues pertaining the zone.

‘’The success of this gathering should not end here. We need to sustain it. First thing is to formalize this initiative. We must also have a group to talk with our governors not only on the Biafran issue but others.’’

Phantom Treasonable Felony Accusation Against Citizen Nnamdi Kanu.

Phantom Treasonable Felony Accusation Against Citizen Nnamdi Kanu:

A Height Of Presidential Recklessness & Mockery Of The Rule Of Law In Nigeria (Onitsha Nigeria, 19th December 2015)-The rule of law and the constitutionalism have finally been nailed to the coffin in Nigeria by President Mohammadu Buhari.

Throughout the history of democracy, rule of law and constitutionalism in the country; be they parliamentary or presidential; Nigeria had never experienced the kind of insult, mockery and bastardization; it presently experiences under barely seven months old Presidency of Retired Maj. General Muhammadu Buhari.


Human rights records of the present administration are also negatively alarming, shocking and deafening. All the third generations of human rights (civil, political, economic, social, cultural, environmental and development/community rights) are observed in gross breach by the Buhari administration.

Nigerian Judiciary under his administration is no longer the bastion of democracy and last hope of the common man. It is now a leprous arm of government; being mocked and cajoled from left, right and center. A civilian government that makes mockery of and disobeys the rule of law and constitutionalism is worst than a mad man running amok with a sharp dagger in a crowded market place.

Citizen Nnamdi Kanu is today, made a prisoner of conscience by President Muhammadu Buhari and his DSS. The President and his DSS had in the past sixty days, flouted and gravely disobeyed four express and consequential orders of the Wuse Zone 2 Magistrate Court and the Federal High Court, Abuja Division bordering on Citizen Nnamdi Kanu’s constitutional rights to personal liberty, association, assembly, dignity of human person, life and expression.

It is freshly recalled that on 19th October 2015, His Worship, Hon Shaibu Usman of the Wuse Zone 2 Magistrate Court in Abuja granted conditional bail to Citizen Nnamdi Kanu and on 22nd October 2015, all the bail conditions were fulfilled; but the DSS
refused to release him on bail; claiming it was acting based on personal directive of President Muhammadu Buhari.

The Magistrate Court order for his bail was followed by two other consequential orders, which were also fragrantly disobeyed
by the same DSS. On 18th November 2015, the DSS told the Wuse Zone 2 Magistrate Court that it had on 10th November 2015 secured an exparte order from the Federal High Court, Abuja Division to detain Citizen Nnamdi Kanu for ninety days for the purpose of investigating him for terrorism and terrorism financing; using the flawed defense of unconstitutional Section 27 (1) of the Terror Act of 2011 as amended.

On 17th December 2015, the same Federal High Court, presided over by Hon Justice Adeniyi Ademola struck out and dismissed the DSS fraudulently and unconstitutionally obtained 90 days detention order and ordered for immediate and unconditional release of Citizen Nnamdi Kanu.

The DSS, again, flouted the order and introduced delay tactics attached with stringent conditions, to frustrate the signing of final discharge papers at the Federal High Court that would have allowed Citizen Kanu to go home same day. We were shocked to observe that 24hours after the DSS brazen resort to delay tactics and stringent conditions; contrary to the order of the Federal High Court; it came up again yesterday (18-12- 2015) with further delay tactics; claiming that its DG must be present andpersonally sign Citizen Kanu’s administrative release order.

As these delay tactics were going on; the Presidency reportedly called and defiantly directed that Citizen Kanu must sign an undertaking renouncing his pro Biafran agitation, as a condition for its compliance with the court order; failure of which, he should remain detained in the DSS custody and be slammed with fresh (false) accusation of treasonable felony.

It was on account of the insistence of Citizen Kanu’s lawyers that the order of the Federal High Court must be obeyed
and enforced to the letter that the DSS refused to release Citizen Kanu; claiming
that he was being held on suspicion of commission of treasonable felony.

Citizen Kanu’s lawyers and family members and friends spent over 14 hours yesterday, from 10am to after midnight, waiting for the DSS to release him to them as ordered by the Federal High Court, all to no avail.

Just like the phantom and failed accusation of terrorism and terrorism financing; the second phantom accusation of treasonable felony is also dead on arrival. We had in one of our recent public statements boldly compared the difference between a democratic statesman and a civilian dictator or despot. While the former binds and heals national wounds; the latter creates and inflicts national wounds; while the former is an upholder and respecter of the rule of law, human rights and constitutionalism; the latter is a manipulator of the rule of law and constitutionalism.

He also exploits the weakest provisions of the laws including retrogressive/retroactive criminal legislations and ouster clauses; for the purpose of entrenching his dictatorial or despotic grip and engaging in gross infringement of the citizens’ fundamental human rights. All the attributes of the latter above mentioned bear true characteristics of President Muhammadu Buhari and his civilian administration.

For the avoidance of doubt, the Offense of Treasonable Felony is defined by Section 41 of the Criminal Code as follows: “Any person who forms an intention to effect any of the following purposes that is to say: To remove during his term of office otherwise than by constitutional means the President as Head of State of the Federation and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces thereof or to likewise remove during this terms of office the Governor of a state or to levy war against Nigeria in order to put any force or compel the President to change his measures or counsels, or in order to put any force or constraint upon, or in order to intimidate or overawe any House of the National Assembly or any other legislative or legislation authority or to instigate any foreigner to make any armed invasion of Nigeria or any of the territories thereof. Manifestation of such intention by an act is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for life”.

Under Section 43 of the same Criminal Code, “a person cannot be tried for treason, treasonable felony or concealment for treason; unless the prosecution is commenced within two years after the offense is committed”. Provided below is the Detention Time Limits under Part 30 of the Administration of the Criminal Justice Act of 2015 (ACJ Act, 2015)), relating to stipulated
periods upon which a citizens accused of committing any offense in Nigeria can be held in pretrial detention through “court remand”, pursuant to application for and issuance of order exparte at the Magistrate Court. By Section 293 (1) of the Act, a
suspect arrested for an offense which a magistrate has no jurisdiction to try shall, within a reasonable time of arrest, be brought before a magistrate court for remand.

(2) An application for remand under Section shall be exparte and shall: (a) be made in the in the prescribed “Report and Request for Remand Form”, as contained in Form 8, in the First Schedule to this Act, and (b) be verified on oath and contain reasons for the remand request.

By Section 295, the Court may, in considering an application for remand, brought under Section 293 of this Act, grant bail to the suspect brought before it, taking into consideration the provisions of Sections 158 to 188 of this Act relating to bail; Section 296 (1), where an order for remand of the suspect is made pursuant to Section 293 of this Act, the order shall be for period not exceeding 14 days in the first instance, and the case shall be returnable within the same period. (2) Where, on application in writing, good cause is shown why there should be an extension of remand period, the court may make an order for further remand of the suspect for a period not exceeding 14 days and make the proceedings
returnable within the same period.

(3) Where the suspect is still in custody on remand at the expiration of the period provided for under subsection (1) or (2) of this Section, the Court may, on the application of the suspect, grant in accordance with the provisions of Sections 158 to 188 of this Act. By Section 296(4), at the expiration of remand order made pursuant to subsection (1) or (2) of this Section, and where the suspect is still remanded with his trial having not commenced, or charge having not been filed at the relevant
court having jurisdiction, the Court shall issue a hearing notice on: (a) the Inspector General of the Police or the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), (b) the Commissioner of Police of a State or the Federal Capital
Territory, or the AGF, as case may be, or (c) any relevant authority in whose custody the suspect is or at whose instance the suspect is remanded, and adjourn the matter within a period not exceeding 14 days of the expiration of the period of remand order made under subsection (1) or (2) of this Section, to inquire as to the position of the case and for the IGP or the State CP and the AGF to show cause why the suspect reminded should not be unconditionally released.

Further, by Section 296(5), where the IGP or the State CP and the AGF show good cause pursuant to subsection (4) of this Section and make a request to that effect, the Court: (a) may extend the remind of the suspect for a final period not exceeding 14 days for the suspect to be arraigned for trial before an appropriate court; and (b) shall make the case returnable within the said 14 days from the date the hearing notice was issued pursuant to subsection (4) of this Section.

(6) Where a good cause is not shown for continue remand of the suspect pursuant to
subsection (4) of this Section, and where the suspect is still remanded in custody after the expiration of the extended period under subsection (5) of this Section, the Court shall with or without application to that effect, discharge the suspect and the suspect shall be immediately released from custody. (7) No further application for remand shall be entertained by any court after the proceeding in subsection (6) of this Section.

Signed: Emeka Umeagbalasi, Board Chairman
International Society for Civil Liberties & the Rule of Law Uzochukwu Oguejiofor-Nwonu, Esq., Head, Campaign & Publicity Department

Finally, we now have the list of Biafran traitors from Igbo-speaking areas of Biafraland

Finally, we now have the list of Biafran traitors from Igbo-speaking areas of Biafraland. They gathered to complete their plans to frustrate Biafra restoration process. Here are their names for the records and judgment day:

Sen Ike Ekweremadu,
Commodore Ebitu Ukiwe, retd,
Mr. Peter Obi,
Prof Ben Nwabueze, SAN,
Prof A.B.C Nwosu,
Chief Joe Irukwu, SAN,
Senator Hope Uzodinma,
Senator Sonni Ogbuju,
Sen Ben Obi,
Prof George Obiozor,
Chief Gary Enwo-Igariwey,
Elder Uma Eleazu.
Osita Ogbu,
Chief Guy Ikokwu,
Chief C.C Ifeanyi,
Bishop Sunday Onuoha,
Chief Charles Odunukwe,
Eze C.I. Ilomuanya,
Eze Gibson Nwosu,
Igwe Chris Onyekwuluije,
Chief Dr. E. A. Ukpabi,
Mr. Emeka Ugwu-Oju,
Chief C.C Ifeanyi,
Chief Christopher Eze,
Chief Charles Odunukwe
------------------------------

*Lament politics of exclusion
*Demand true federalism

BY CHARLES KUMOLU

NO fewer than 60 prominent Igbo leaders met yesterday in Lagos where they called for an end to the ongoing pro-Biafra street protests in Nigeria.

The eminent persons, who met under the auspices of Concerned Igbo Elders, Traditional Rulers and Stakeholders cautioned against exporting the protests.

At the event which was attended by serving and former public office holders, academicians, traditional rulers and the clergy, the assumption that the outrage was provoked by the poor state of infrastructure in the South-East geopolitical zone was unanimously dismissed.

The leaders noted that the alleged exclusion of the zone in the sharing of key political offices, informed the protests.

Those at the event included the Deputy Senate President; Sen Ike Ekweremadu, Commodore Ebitu Ukiwe, retd, Mr. Peter Obi, Prof Ben Nwabueze, SAN, Prof A.B.C Nwosu, Chief Joe Irukwu, SAN, Senator Hope Uzodinma, Senator Sonni Ogbuju, Sen Ben Obi, Prof George Obiozor, Chief Gary Enwo-Igariwey, and Elder Uma Eleazu.

Others were Osita Ogbu, Chief Guy Ikokwu, Chief C.C Ifeanyi, Bishop Sunday Onuoha, Chief Charles Odunukwe, Eze C.I. Ilomuanya, Eze Gibson Nwosu, Igwe Chris Onyekwuluije, Chief Dr. E. A Ukpabi, Mr. Emeka Ugwu-Oju, Chief C.C Ifeanyi, Chief Christopher Eze, Chief Charles Odunukwe and leaders of various market associations in Lagos among others.

A communique issued at the forum reads: “This meeting was convened at the instance of the Deputy Senate President, Sen Ike Ekweremadu. The meeting was of the view that Ndigbo are dissatisfied with their current position in Nigeria. The meeting noted that Nigeria is a negotiated federation of three regions in 1960. And our fore fathers played a major role in bringing it to be.

“Ndigbo have reviewed the ongoing street and public protests by the youths calling for Biafra and are of the considered opinion that these are outward expressions of the psychological and physical pain arising from the current exclusion of the South East geo-political zone from the governance of the country and this should be addressed and redressed.

“Consequently, Ndigbo strongly recommend that dialogue be embraced in order to remedy the situation. All public protests should be stopped. And more importantly the public protests should not be exported. Ndigbo are deeply saddened by the loss of lives arising from the protest. Enough Igbo blood has been spilled in Nigeria.’’

Thursday, December 17, 2015

Over 150 IPOB were shot by Nigeria military task force for celebrating the release of Nnamdi Kanu at Head Bridge Onitsha.


OVER 150 IPOB WERE SHOT BY NIGERIA MILLITARY JOINT TASKFORCE RIGHT NOW AT HEAD BRIDGE ONITSHA SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY WERE JUBLATING THE RELEASE OF NNAMDI KANU.

Security Operatives Kill 3 IPOB Members In Onitsha While Celebrating Kanu’s Release


ONITSHA - News reaching us from eyewitnesses indicate that security operatives reported to be men of the Nigerian army have shot and killed 3 persons in Bridge head Onitsha as they were celebrating news of Radio Biafra Director, Nnamdi Kanu’s release

We however could not confirm the identities of the dead as at the time of filing in this report.

Recall that a federal High Court sitting in Abuja on Thursday ordered an unconditional release of Kanu stating that his continued detention was unlawful.

UPDATE:
Reporter, Tochukwu Ifeduba gives his own side of the story...

Today, as members of the Indigenous People of Biafra were jubilating over the release of their leader Nnamdi Kanu, soldiers said to be attached to the Onitsha Military cantonment shot at them, killing five on the spot while many sustained various degrees of injuries.

The incident which occurred at the Onitsha end of the Niger Bridge reportedly caused panic among motorists and commuters as they scampered. It would be recalled that IPOB members had on hearing about the court's favourable verdict on Kanu yesterday morning, converged at the statue of the late Biafran leader, Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu in large number for a procession in jubilation but were frustrated by the presence of the armed soldiers and policemen.

An eyewitness, and a timber trader at Bridge-Head Market, Onitsha who did not want his name in print told our correspondent that trouble started when the jubilating IPOB members were asked to stop their match towards the Niger Bridge, but the group bluntly refused.

According to the source it was at this juncture that the soldiers started shooting sporadically probably in a bid to scare the intimidating crowd of IPOB members away that the five IPOB members were shot dead by stray bullets. As blood and corpses littered the road, motorists and commuters who could not bear the heavy gunshots jumped out of their vehicles and ran for safety as the jubilation turned soar. The courageous IPOB members reportedly threw pebbles at the rampaging soldiers who retaliated by continuous shooting.

Reacting to the incident, the Chairman of Fundamental Rights League International, FRLI, Comrade Mike Umezulike said that the protest of the IPOB members was peaceful and wondered why the soldiers should shoot at the IPOB members without committing any offence. He regretted that the Military that are disciplined sometimes behave as if they are untrained in the way they go about with the civil populace.

According to him, "do you know that the Naval officers at the Uga Junction always order civilians to jump like frog whenever they commit any minor offence like crossing the express way without using the pedestrian bridge". "Sometimes they will order the offenders to kneel down and carry tyres up and also to climb the electric pole there. This is inhuman and an act of wickedness and I believe that their commander may not know the atrocities these officers commit at Uga junction on daily basis, Comrade Umezulike disclosed further.


When contacted, Divisional Police Officer in- charge of the area Rabiu Garba said he was not in town though he was told of the protest.Source

GOV NYESOM WIKE'S HONOR OF YAKUBU GOWON IN RIVERS STATE, MISGUIDED, STUPIDITY AND IMBECILIC.


Biafra Restoration, says the recent honoring of the genocidal Yakubu Jackal Gowon by Rivers States Governor Nyesom Wike, whereby he renamed a street and a stadium after Gowon, is most regrettable. It is a very pathetic move, made by an unthinking buffoon, who is either very ignorant of history or did not give a damn nor care enough to understand the ramifications of his action. How could any sane man honor a man who caused so much pain and sorrow to a people, whose roots and names, Governor Wike shares; admitted that he removed the "N" in his last name and instead of "Nwike", settled for "Wike"? Biafra Restoration, asks how could a man, who is supposedly acquiesced of the dark place reserved for Yakubu Gowon among the people formerly of Biafra, consider honoring such a vampire who drove utmost joy in watching millions of Biafran women and children starved to death?

How could any God-fearing man honor Yakubu Gowon after the depravity that was his twenty pounds payment to returning Biafrans despite whatever they previously had in their bank accounts? How could any man who does not think through his anus, ever consider honoring a bloodhound like Yakubu Gowon who declared no victor and no vanquished, yet treated returning Biafrans in this manner? The same wild dog bandied the sloganeering three Rs of reconciliation, rehabilitation and reconstruction; but went on to implement his reconstruction in Lagos, which did not witness the war pillaging; instead of the theatre of the war that was the Southeast? This is the man Nyesom Wike honored and Biafra Restoration, asks for what or is Wike telling all those hurt by Gowon to go fuck themselves?

Biafra Restoration, decries this as indeed regrettable that the fat thuggish man in Rivers State's government house PortHarcourt did not think through his action, otherwise he would have seized himself of its lack of merit. Biafra Restoration, queries, where else in Nigeria has that name Yakubu Gowon been associated with anything joyful or worth celebrating? What is there to celebrate of such an animal, who after causing all those deaths in Biafra, went ahead to plan a coup that killed Muritala Mohammed? A Gowon, who but for President Shehu Shagari's amnesty would still have remained a persona non grata in Nigeria, exiled in the United Kingdom. But no, Nyesom Wike wants some cheap publicity and he renamed old Aba Road as well as former Liberation Stadium after this hyena.

Biafra Restoration, hereby categorically condemn the action of Governor Nyesom Wike as very insensitive and not carefully thought through. How does Wike reconcile his action to the over three million Biafran lives took by Yakubu Gowon? So what if Gowon created Rivers States which was not out of his love for the people of Ikwerre but done in his failed attempt to box in and completely emasculate Ndigbo and cut them completely off from the Atlantic Ocean, as a land locked entity. But Gowon forgot that Biafra was not just only an Igbo effort as Philip Effiong was not Igbo, neither were other minorities of the then Eastern region who participated in the Biafran effort of self determination. Hopefully a more thinking governor would some day emerge in Rivers State to redress this slap on the face and erase this Berom jackal's name from the two landmarks. Governor Nyesom Wike, Biafra Restoration, says, you are a disgrace and disappointment to Biafra and you should be ashamed of your deplorable action.

ALERT: Threat to life of Nnamdi Kanu.



Radio Biafra London and the Indigenous People of Biafra IPOB is hereby raising an alarm on the credible information reaching the directorate of IPOB that a dangerous plan surrounding the acquitting of the Director of Radio Biafra and Leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Prince Nnamdi Kanu at the court yesterday and today is for him to be assassinated on his way home from the DSS facilities in Abuja. This is to try to exonerate themselves from his death.

So we are by this publication putting the whole world and the International Community on notice of the evil plans of the Nigeria government to assassinate Nnamdi Kanu in cold blood having failed to kill him in the cell for fear of being responsible for his death. The Directorate of State of the Indigenous People of Biafra is hereby warning the Nigeria agents not to carry out their plans against the Director of Radio Biafra Nnamdi Kanu, as this will spell doom for Nigeria.

The life of the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra IPOB is still in the hands of the Nigerian authority until he returns to London where he came back from, because he is a British citizen. British High Commission are hereby put on notice about this threat to the life of Nnamdi Kanu. British High Commission is therefore enjoined to arrange and provide adequate protection for Nnamdi Kanu because Nnamdi Kanu's life is in a grave danger. This information is credible and British Government will be held complicit if any thing happened to Nnamdi Kanu.

NOTE: Nnamdi Kanu's life and safety is still in the hands of the Nigeria authority and Nigeria government cannot be trusted...a country that does not obey court order.Source

By: BIAFRA WRITERS

‎Biafra: Court orders Kanu’s release from detention




By Ikechukwu Nnochiri

ABUJA—–Barely 24 hours after charge against him was struck out, the Federal High Court in Abuja, today, ordered the Department of State Service, DSS, to forthwith, release ‎the detained ‎leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Mr. Nnamdi Kanu.‎

Ruling on the fundamental right enforcement suit Kanu lodged before the high court, Justice Ademola Adeniyi, said there was no basis for the applicant to remain in custody since there is currently no charge pending against him.

The court stressed that Kanu is entitled to his right to liberty as enshrined in section 35(1) (4) and (5) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.

According to the court, the continued detention of Kanu after two months without trial, violates Section 158 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 and Section 35 of the 1999 Constitution.

Justice Ademola said there was no law permitting the DSS or any other security agency to detain any Nigerian beyond two months without any concrete move to try such person before a competent court.‎

The judge said available facts before him showed that the DSS was not minded to release Kanu on bail‎.‎

He therefore ordered the DSS to immediately grant ‎unconditional bail to the applicant.

‎The court had earlier granted the DSS leave to detain the IPOB leader for 90 days.

The order followed an application that was filed before the court by counsel to the DSS, Mr. Moses Idakwo, ‎who insisted that the security agency needed the time to conclude investigation into fresh allegation that Kanu was into terrorism financing‎.

‎In a counter-affidavit he filed against Kanu’s suit, DSS, ‎said its investigations revealed that the applicant who it identified as the brain behind recent clamour for the creation of ‘Biafra Republic’, has already received huge sums of money to purchase weapons.

It told the court that prior to his arrest, Kanu, had already made enquiries about prices of all the weapons he intended to buy.

The counter-affidavit was deposed to by a senior officer with the DSS, Mr. Ayo Ibitoye, who averred that it would be in the interest of justice, peace and order, to allow the IPOB leader to remain in custody of the security agency.

The argument was however rejected by the high court ‎today.

‎It will be recalled Kanu who is also the Director of Radio Biafra and Television, ‎‎ was on October 17, arrested in Lagos by security operatives, shortly after he arrived Nigeria from his base in the United Kingdom.

He was subsequently arraigned before a Chief Magistrate Court in Abuja ‎over allegation that he engaged in‎ criminal conspiracy, managed and belonged to an unlawful society.

In the First ‎Information Report, FIR, it entered before Chief Magistrate Shauibu Usman, FG, aside accusing Kanu of indulging in criminal intimidation, contrary ‎to section 97 (a)&(b) and section 397 of the Penal Code, maintained that it has evidence that he was involved in terrorism financing.

Meanwhile, Kanu on October 19, pleaded not ‎guilty to the charge and was eventually ‎granted bail to the tune of N2million.

The court further directed the defendant to produce a civil servant of Grade Level 16, to stand as his surety.

However, the accused person alleged that the Nigerian government refused to release ‎him from detention despite the fact that he met the bail conditions.‎

‎Moves by Kanu’s lawyer, Mr. ‎Egechukwu Obetta, to enforce the bail granted to his client by the Magistrate Court was thwarted by the DSS which applied to withdraw the charge upon which the bail was granted.

The DSS, in its notice for discontinuance, asked Magistrate Usman to ‎hands-off the matter, saying it has concluded plans to file fresh charge against Kanu before a higher court that has the jurisdiction to try terrorism case.

Consequently, the Magistrate court, on Wednesday, struck out the charge, even as it discharged Kanu.

Kanu had in his fundamental right enforcement suit, prayed the high court to set aside the order it made ex-parte, on November 11, in Suit No. FHC/Abj/CS/873/2015, which gave the DSS leave to further detain him.

He applied for,‎ “An order of court admitting the applicant to bail and directing the respondent to comply with the order of the Chief Magistrate Court, Wuse Zone 2, Abuja, admitting the applicant to bail in Suit No. Abj/CMC/CR/21/2015, between the State Security Services V. Nnamdi Kanu”.

Kanu’s lawyer contended that FG failed to adduce any evidence to support its allegation that Kanu is a terrorist, supports and finances terrorism and is preparing to take arms against the Nigerian state.

“The continued detention of the applicant in the face of an ord‎er of a court that he be released is a trespass on the person of the applicant and a violation of the basic freedoms of the applicant as guaranteed by the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as amended.

“Section 27(1) of the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act 2013 and any provision of that Act which empowers the court to make an order for the detention of the applicant or anybody else anytime beyond 24 hours without trial is ultra vires the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as amended”, Kanu’s lawyer added.Source
‎‎‎
More details soon‎

Putin calls Trump an ‘outstanding, talented’ man



Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday described US Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump as a talented and outstanding man.

“He is a very outstanding man, unquestionably talented,” Putin was quoted by Russian news agencies as saying after his annual press conference in Moscow. “He is the absolute leader of the presidential race.”

Wednesday, December 16, 2015

N750,000 ‘too much’for Eaglets – Presidency




This week the government of President Muhammadu Buhari has warned that next year will be rough for the country because of the poor economy and has moved to cut back drastically on government spendings.

It would therefore be seen as double standards if the government now splashes a fortune on the schoolboy stars.

“The proposal has been reviewed after the first rejection. We wait for the green light from the presidency on the date for the reception and the reward,” a sports ministry official disclosed.

A much lower proposal of 150,000 Naira per player of the victorious Golden Eaglets has been tabled by the sports ministry after a proposal of 750,000 Naira-a-player was rejected by the country’s Presidency as “too much”.

It has already been reported that the federal government has rejected an initial proposal by the sports ministry to reward the Eaglets after they won a fifth FIFA U-17 World Cup in Chile last month.

This week the government of President Muhammadu Buhari has warned that next year will be rough for the country because of the poor economy and has moved to cut back drastically on government spendings.

It would therefore be seen as double standards if the government now splashes a fortune on the schoolboy stars.

“The proposal has been reviewed after the first rejection. We wait for the green light from the presidency on the date for the reception and the reward,” a sports ministry official disclosed.

Wind of revolt in S-East: Why Biafra must rise again —protesters, others.




By NWABUEZE OKONKWO, ONITSHA

Several days after, the protests ignited by the agitation for the unconditional release of Mr. Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, continue to gather momentum, sweeping through the South East and parts of the South-South like a hurricane. The protesters are irked by the continued detention of Nnamdi Kanu by the Department of Security Services, DSS, even after an Abuja Municipal Magistrate Court at Wuse Zone 2 had granted him bail.

Although it started as a peaceful demonstration, but within few hours after its commencement, one of the protesters was shot dead by a local vigilante operative attached to Ochanja market, Onitsha, Anambra State.

A source said the deceased who was harassing some shop owners to close their shop or face the wrath of the IPOB ignored several verbal and gun shot warnings by the operatives before he was shot dead.

Yet, other sources said on sighting the protesters, the vigilante operative opened fire on them and shot the deceased dead on the spot, adding that even some policemen and soldiers on duty with the vigilante operative blamed him for the action.

Currently, the protest appeared to have recorded its biggest success in the commercial city of Onitsha and other parts of Anambra State as traders and other members of the public continue to demonstrate solidarity with the protesters.

During the demonstration, the IPOB members gathered at the Bridge-head end of Onitsha from where they spread to other parts of the commercial city and proceeded to Awka, the state capital through Nkpor, Ogidi, Umunnachi, Abagana, Enugwu-Ukwu, Amawbia and Awka and as they patrol on foot, the police and other security agencies monitored them curiously.

Meanwhile, reactions have continued to trail the protests, especially its link to demand for the resurrection of the defunct Republic of Biafra. Among those who reacted over the development were the Igbo Youths Forum, IYF, Concerned Eastern Youths Initiatives, CEYI, the International Society for Civil Liberties and the Rule of Law, Intersociety, among others.

The Campaign for Democracy, CD, in its own reaction, called on the Federal Government to release Kanu because a court of competent jurisdiction had already granted him bail and as such, his continued detention amounted to extra-judicial action.

CD’s South East Zonal Chairman, Uzor A. Uzor, reminded the Federal Government of the need to be a respecter of law and not a violator of law, adding that the violation of the court order was capable of setting a bad precedence in future.

Intersociety, in its own statement, said: “Many factors have made agitation for Biafra statehood loud and unquenchable. Chief among them is continued institutiona-lisation of triggers of divided society and inability and unwillingness of past and present governments in Nigeria, particularly the Buhari administration to bind, heal and run an all inclusive or pluralistic government”.

Intersociety’s statement signed by its Chairman, Board of Directors, Comrade Emeka Umeagbalasi, further declared: “Divisions abound deeply in the country, day in day out. Lopsidedness also abounds in all the appointments so far made by Buhari administration. The federal public and civil service appointments and promotions are deeply lopsided and there are no signs of addressing them; rather there are signs of deepening them thickening everyday. In all, there are entrenched structural imbalances, injustices and violence in every aspect of the Nigerian polity.

“Totality of these is extensively responsible for the increased agitation for Biafran Statehood; this is more so when the agitators are the worst victims. The gravest mistake of the 2015 presidential poll was the emergence and resurgence of fanatics of divided society who are unrepentant promoters of ethnocentrism and primordialism,” the statement added.

“It is on all these premise that agitation for Biafran homeland is built. As for whether the struggle will materialise, there are internationally established processes of struggle for self-determination, particularly those involving non-violence. Of the two newest independent countries of East Timor and South Sudan, one was gotten violently and the other non-violently. South Sudan got hers after 30 years of bloody civil war with mother Sudan, and East Timor got hers non-violently from Indonesia and after many years of non-violent struggle powered by dictatorial governing styles of the government of Muhammed Suharto.

“The first stage of the non-violent struggle for self determination or statehood is awareness campaigns and local and international pressures and the last stage is organisation by UNO of a referendum for the agitating party and if the majority vote for self-government, then the new statehood is born. Countries have, in history, negotiated and re-negotiated their instruments of existence and togetherness and some have voted to live apart (i.e. Czech & Slovakia) and others to live together (i.e. United Germany). Former Soviet Union got divided non-violently into 15 Republics in 1991, and Yugoslavia violently divided into six Republics between 1995 and 2001.”

In their own reaction, the Concerned Eastern Youths Initiatives, CEYI, cautioned IPOB members and other pro-Biafra groups against attending a recent meeting convened by Governor Rochas Okorocha in Owerri, the Imo State capital. Coordinator of CEYI, Emma Powerful said: “IPOB protests will continue until they release Nnamdi Kanu unconditionally”.

Describing the exercise as legitimate, a legal practitioner based in Onitsha and Chairman of Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, Idemili branch, Ben Okoko, said the right to protest by the IPOB members is guaranteed under the Constitution of Nigeria, adding that if truth must be told, the agitation is predicated on marginalisation.

According to Okoko: “If there is justice and equity in sharing our natural resources, the struggle will cease. Resources are not shared commensurately according to revenues generated from the South East and South-South zones of the country”.

He however cautioned against poor coordination of the agitation, adding that its legitimacy should not be abused with violence and criminal tendencies. He also charged security agencies to see themselves as unbiased umpires and as such should not harass, molest or attack the protesters, but rather monitor them and ensure that they did not misbehave.

He advised our elected officers like Governors, National and State Assembly members and other political appointees to tread with caution to avoid either committing treason or attracting the wrath of the agitators because, according to him, having been elected under the Nigerian Constitution, if they openly support the agitators, it would amount to treason and if they support the government in attacking the agitators, they might risk their houses being torched or even their lives being threatened.

President of Igbo Youths Forum, IYF, Anunihu Uzor, noted that traders supported the agitation to the extent that most of them closed their shops, while some of them even joined in the demonstration because there is no motorable road in the entire South East region, neither are there Federal Government presence in the zone.

Anunihu noted that if government had addressed these issues squarely instead of arresting, detaining and refusing to release Nnamdi Kanu in defiance of court order, there would have been no need to agitate for Biafra restoration, not to talk of embarking on the demonstration exercise.

Also in his own reaction entitled: “Biafra is on course!!!”, Comrade Peter Okala, Former Governorship Candidate of the National Conscience Party, NCP in Anambra State and President- General of Ndigbo United Assembly, NUA, declared: “My take on the Biafran agitation is positive in the sense that our colonial masters knew our differences to have made a contract of one 100 years known as amalgamation for us to try if we could understand ourselves, but the fact remained that till date, the centre could not hold and the South is still hated with passion by our Northern and Western brothers”.

According to Okala: “Today if one is asked to name 100 most corrupt people in Nigeria who have stolen our treasury dry, hardly will an Igbo man be among them. But we are abused in every part of Nigeria as people who could do anything to get money. Reason? Because the West is in control of the media and the North has partnered with them to marginalise the South East.

“ I advocate a peaceful agitation to achieve Biafra because the North and West are going to become our close neigbours when our prayers are answered. The present structure of lesser states in the South East which amounted to lesser number of legislators and local government councils are some of the glaring evidences of marginalisation of our zone.

“It is worthy of note that the present administration is encouraging the secession of every group by their unpopular policies and programmes, a government that has no listening ears to protests and popular agitations by its own citizens could not be said to have a human face.

“The arrest and continued detention of a non-violent agitator is a promotion to that course and Nigeria is the one promoting the agitation by the unprofessional use of security agents against the agitators, which means that Nigeria is the one promoting lawlessness by working against the United Nations declaration on human rights which she is a signatory to.”

Leader of Movement for Outright Discontinuation of the Exploitation and Annihilation of Easterners, MODEAE, Comrade Arinze Awogu, in his own statement entitled: “Death and its harbingers have ceased to frighten Biafrans: The True Leader of Biafran people has finally emerged”, noted that “as the Biafra protest rages, it is good that we remind ourselves the purpose of this quest; what we are struggling to safeguard and why we are so determined to continue to fight for the release of Nnamdi Kanu and the restoration of the independence of Biafra”.

“We have borne the brunt of this quest, we have suffered marginalisation, deprivation, ostracisation and all manner of conceivable deaths in the hands of an enemy that is so cruel, that is so wicked and that has used all manners of weapons to not only cage us as a people and stop us from developing at our own pace-keeping us in a state of arrested development, but has without respite hounded us into detention and daily murdering us for daring to ask for our freedom.

“But today we rise up to recite before the enemy the portion of the Biafran Anthem that says: ‘if the price be death that we owe to pay, so let us all die without any shred of fear’. Death and its harbingers have ceased to frighten us; they no longer condition our thoughts. We have opted for death instead. Life is now meaningless to us. We consider ourselves dead already and as such we are not afraid of dying for he that is on the ground is no longer afraid of falling. This protest must go on. It is a battle of homeland and we are putting in our all.

In a slogan titled: ‘Release Lord Nnamdi Kanu Now! And Give Us Biafra Or We All Die’, Awogu declared:”Give us Biafra or we all die is the expression on the lips of everyone; from Bayelsa to Cross-River, from Akwa-Ibom to Rivers to Delta to Anambra to Imo to Abia to Ebonyi to Enugu to parts of Edo, to parts of Kogi, to parts of Benue and to parts of Southern Cameroon, the frenzy is rapturous, it is electrifying, it is a moving train, nothing stands on its wake.

“In the words of George Orwell: ‘…if liberty means anything at all, it means the ability to tell people what they do not want to hear.’ President Buhari and his likes must continue to be inundated with the Biafra nightmare that is Biafra restoration.The extra-judicially detained Director of Radio Biafra, whom we now choose to refer to and call Lord Nnamdi Kanu has proven to be the spark-plug for an idea whose time has indeed come. He has galvanised Biafrans the world over while in detention far more than he was able to do before his arrest through the IPOB. Across the globe, the Biafran spirit and the longing for Biafra is more than ever before revived.

“The Afarukwu-Ibekwu-Umuahia-born Lord Nnamdi Kanu, a Prince from a Royal family, floated Radio Biafra out of nothing to generate lots of waves across the world which makes restoration of Biafra a catch phrase among Biafrans and enemies of Biafra alike. The second phase of the march to Biafra restoration no doubt threw up characters that at some point showed traces of the kind of leaders needed to steer the ship of the Biafra struggle to a safe dock.

“But many had found reason to doubt and question the sincerity of the lot save for Lord Nnamdi Kanu whose blistering campaign for Biafra in less than three years has gotten global appeal with a style that is so so irresistible and captivating. He has gradually become a darling and the most sought after Biafran campaigner worldwide with many fearing that the accolade might get into his head and make him drift away like others before him by the time he regains his freedom. But he had already in anticipation sworn with his son and household never to betray the trust placed on him by the Biafran people.

“Born in the thick of the genocidal war waged against his Biafran people, Lord Nnamdi Kanu had unapologetically affirmed that the ‘zoo’ referred to as Nigeria only exists today because the White Europeans said so, insisting that it was not created by God the natural way all nations on earth came into existence. But rather was conceived in the heart of man to serve a purpose for which nation states were not and could not be designed for. …

“He is the humble servant of the good people of Biafra and the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Biafra. As a servant of the Biafran people, he has remained a dutiful worker for the Biafran cause and a vicarious pride and source of inspiration to new generation of Biafrans who see in him the bulwark that will crystalize the independence of Biafra.

“The White man has a way of distinguishing a special breed that achieved a special feat in extraordinary circumstances from others. The Director of Radio Biafra should have the toga of’Lord’ to his name, for in detention as in freedom, he has brought the people closer to Biafra. The ongoing protest would have achieved its main objectives with the unconditional release of Lord Nnamdi Kanu and Biafran independence restored; and will not stop save these two are met; anything other than these two, the protest has to continue unabated with a renewed vigour”.

…Ohaneze, Igbo statesmen in consultation

INDICATIONS emerged yesterday that the apex Igbo socio-cultural organisation and some elder statesmen of Igbo extraction have embarked on consultation to come up with a common voice on how to handle the ongoing protests across the country by the Indigenous People of Biafra.

A source close the both camps told Vanguard Features that Ohaneze ought to have called for an end to the protests, but some Igbo elder statesmen are of the opinion that issues that provoked the protests are germane.

It was gathered given the sensitivity of the matter, the apex group has commenced consultations with prominent Igbo leaders on how to have a common stand on the issue.

According to the source: ‘’Ohaneze and some statesmen in Igbo land are being circumspect. But I can tell you that they are trying to be on the same page on this sensitive matter. The good thing is that both want the country restructured in line with the recommendations of the Confab. The South-East deserves an equitable share in this country, but as things are today, the zone is obviously marginalised. That is what those boys are protesting for. They want a country where every region will be treated fairly. I can assure you that Ndigbo, will speak with one voice on the issue in a matter of days.”

Further findings, showed that the leaders are not on same ground on the matter, as they differ on whether to condemn the ongoing protests, for fear of not incurring the wrath of the protesters.